phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Wed Sep 12 19:14:12 CEST 2007
In message <ujrir6f3jkw.fsf at false.linpro.no>, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rg
>"Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk at phk.freebsd.dk> writes:
>The rest of my
>proposal is still valid: vcl_hit() still needs to be able to make a
>decision about using the existing object or replacing it, vcl_miss()
>still needs to be split in two, etc.
I don't agree.
We can just allow vcl_hit() to issue a miss action (ie: "sorry can't
use this hit") and go directly to vcl_miss(), just like we can go
to vcl_pass() already.
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the varnish-dev